In a great zigzag of irony an ethnopluralism of ethnostates defines progress in political philosophy

The biology that defines our differences by defining human nature as basically and genetically kin-centered and ethnocentric (see the science of sociobiology) also can show us how to create order out of imperialism or supremacism by developing an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. As one historian put it, what formerly divided us can put us back together again.

When we look at, say, the middle east we see that imperialism or supremacism in that region go directly against real human nature and the biology that defines ethnic differences. For example, Israel deserves its own state or ethnostate, but so does Palestine, Saudi Arabia and Iran, and when any of these states tries to rule supreme over the others for whatever reason it is they who are the war-mongers and immoral disruptor's of peace and order. Bigger players like the United States, Russia and China are also guilty of pushing their own imperialism or supremacism.

But humans will be competing humans and so we will always need to protect the sovereignty of ethnostates (eventually thousands of ethnostates) with some sort of federalism. In the U.S. an ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

There will always be wars, or at least rumors of war, but there has been "progress" in political philosophy, even though traditionalist's don't like the word and liberal's deny real human nature. In a great zigzag of irony an ethnopluralism of ethnostates defines progress in political philosophy.