Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Radicalism versus Reform
Serious reformers don't wish to weaken
the struggle, as the radicals accuse them of doing, but they do
usually wish to remove the radicalism from the struggle. The path of
reform is the path of legality, the path of radicalism is often
illegal and self-defeating.
The West has deteriorated so far that
quick radical solutions are not deep enough or long-term enough, and
they often hinder the solutions. There is so much to correct that
endurance and patience are needed.
The rise out of degeneration may take
several generations or more, since religion, philosophy, art, etc.,
all need reforming. No civilization ever lasted long without a
religious foundation, and religion is largely lost in the West, and
new and reformed religions take generations to establish.
For example, two deep reforms I
advocate here are Theological Materialism in religious philosophy (material life evolving to supermaterial Godhood),
and Ethnopluralism in political philosophy (grounded in group-selection as the primary unit of human selection),
both of which could take generations to establish given our present
indirect cultural Marxism (“It is forbidden to forbid” ), and rule
by global corporations.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment