Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Toward evolutionary conservatism
Nietzsche thought the aim of education
was not merely to “know” the past but to produce and cultivate
individual greatness in the present culture, which is what the
ancient Greeks did so well. But now we need also to be concerned
with developing great individuals sociobiologically, not merely
culturally. This sounds shocking to modern minds because we don't
admit the modern perversities. For example, such things as demanding absolute equality of conditions for all people is now politically
correct, a perverse twisting of the idea of the equality of opportunity. This is perverse when compared with real human
nature in human history. The frustrating thing is, these modern
perversities were often pursued not with real moral concern but as
methods to power for those seeking to rise in more fixed cultures.
But history has a way of snapping back
to what human nature actually is, as sociobiology and a few courageous historians have taught us. We need a revitalized conservatism, we
need evolutionary conservatism, and we will probably get it, if we
can survive that long. A nation and even a world of thousands of
mostly independent small states or ethnostates protected by a light
regional federalism is what humans form into, if natural human nature
is allowed to come forward. And this time with the important addition of cooperative rather than uncooperative competition, which
humans are capable of if we try. This will also better permit our
continuing sociobiological and sacred evolution.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment