Sunday, June 23, 2013
The denial of human nature
Human nature does not change much if at
all and has not changed since the ancient hunter-gatherer times
before large civilizations began. This means we can understand human
nature and we can represent human nature in philosophy, politics and
art and in our daily lives. Human nature is both atavistic, present
and future.
It is astounding how distorted this has
become, with modern philosophy even saying there is no human nature,
no essence, only changing outer existence. By calling human nature
“relative” and not fixed this tends to make life seem meaningless,
which is a state actually championed by some thinkers. Even some
religions have had problems with human nature calling it evil.
According to sociobiological studies
and according to historically observation, human nature is innately
conservative and we developed traditional values because these helped
us survive and reproduce more successfully than not having these
values. But human nature is also more deeply evolutionary, which
suggests an Ordered Evolution rather than merely unchanging ordered
tradition. There is an underlying telos to human nature and
existence, we are evolving to Godhood in the cosmos.
How can you build a culture that
ignores what we are, that ignores human nature, and why would you
want to ? Modernity doesn't seem to like what we actually are, or
they want to distort it so they may advance some other agenda, at
least for a time, because then, often after much trouble, societies
and human beings go back to what they are, which is not merely
“going back” but living in the present and evolving forward.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment