Darwin is only temporarily losing to cultural Marxism

Reality is hard to see yet alone accept regarding the competition between cultural Marxism and Darwin. Although they may wish traditional values to be outdated, liberal notions of which gender is better fitted to what, socialist paternalism, egalitarianism in all things, gay rights, etc, and most of the changes taking place from cultural Marxism, have done more damage than good in all the important areas of living.

Women certainly should receive equal pay for equal work, but there has been a dramatic increase in single parent families—41 percent of babies are born to single women—although the birth rate of white women is well below the replacement level. Many studies have shown that children from single families do not do as well as children from traditional marriages.

Some may ask, so what? This attitude indicates living in the grip of nihilism, nothingness. If we don't replace ourselves, or if we do a poor job raising our children, we are going against the strongest drives of human nature, and the main purpose of living itself.

Meanwhile, women are buying $1.358 billion dollars worth of romance novels (2010), which tend to portray a Darwinian world of traditional gender roles and conservative values, even if a modern approach to these things is taken.

It is ironic that many conservatives are against evolution and Darwinism which in many ways affirm traditional values, and this has enhanced the strength of cultural Marxism.

Human nature says that culture, including cultural Marxism, is on a biological leash, and it will always snap back to human nature. We have basically the same human nature as we had in hunter/gatherer times. And human nature leads to largely traditional values.  Granted changes will take place, creativity is vital, but the new has to fit into old human nature or the new does not last long.