Can we protect ourselves from Bernie Sanders and the other fools and demagogues of these presidential debates?

Watching the dumb-ass democratic presidential debate last night, with the promise of another dumb-ass debate tonight, I thought of how our country is now too big for democracy to work. What would Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, who criticized democracy as being corrupt and basically inefficient, think of this crop of fools and demagogues?  

Bernie Sanders, one of the last breed of angry Marxist/Socialists born in Brooklyn, New York City, leads this crop of fools and demagogues. Sanders is full of high resentment against capitalist elites, and wants to replace them with Marxist/Socialist elites like himself, even though Lenin and Stalin killed more people than Hitler, after trying to do what Bernie wants to do supposedly with less violence in the U.S. And the Soviets lasted only 69 years!...Joe Biden believes the same things as Bernie but is just more inept or gutless at describing them.

We are now too big, too populated, too diverse, to create one orderly or harmonious democratic society. Human nature is primarily kin and ethnic centered, no matter what modern liberalism preaches. It is not difficult to predict that such diversity will break apart into workable societies of related groups that are able to bond together because they are related and share the same general genetic pool and same culture, that is what evolution often does. We see it now in the ethnic neighborhoods that developed in spite of years of propaganda of the Marxist/Socialist variety insisting that we are all the same.

So the solution to the radically destructive civil disruptions, or even civil wars which are now increasing across the world within unworkable multicultural, multi-ethnic societies, is to gradually and legally form an ethnopluralism of ethnostates as the best possible political configuration for humans beings to live within, given real human nature---that is also the only way real democracy can work. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from marauding Marxist/Socialists like Bernie Sanders and the other fools and demagogues of these presidential debates.

Why I am not an existentialist

Existentialism says, "we are what we think, what we say and how we act, we identify with all those things, it is not the other way around, nature does not force us to act in any particular way."

I believe just the opposite. Nature in fact causes us to behave in a certain way, and our minds are part of nature. Does this place essence before existence? When nature is defined as essence they are the same thing. The biological origin of social behavior co-evolves with the minds and cultures it first activates.

Then there is the material activation within life, in every cell of the body, which I call Tirips, activating life to materially evolve eventually to ascending levels of Godhood, which is also the zenith of success in survival and reproduction, shaped by natural outside evolution. This too is part of nature, and not spiritual, although it is the source of future religion.

This takes some of the so-called freedom away, which was never there in the first place, but we should not lament it, because getting in harmony with what we really are and where we are really going within nature is a sacred thing---we still have freedom and choice within determined paths.

This is theological materialism.

Social niceties and good manners have reached their limit in smoothing over race and class differences

We hear the charge of “racism” now more than in the 1960s civil rights movement, and the trite saying that we have a class problem not a race problem isn't helping matters. Why?

Social niceties and good manners grow in importance the more diverse people are living in the same space, just as exaggerated social manners happen among international diplomats dealing with big differences between distinctly different nations, races, and classes.

By the 1960's social niceties and good manners reached their limit in smoothing over race and class differences in the South, which always prided themselves on the social niceties and good manners that developed mainly to smooth over racial and class differences. Some of this polite behavior also derived from the culture of England which had very big differences between classes.

In rural parts of country, such as the Midwest, exaggerated social manners seem not as necessary because there are fewer differences between races and classes. These are the people that Hillary Clinton called a basket of deplorables, which she characterized as being “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic.” The basket of deplorables had no need for the exaggerated social manners of international diplomats which look phony to them because it is necessarily phony behavior.

The big secret blocked by the phony political correctness of people like Hillary Clinton is that the charge of “racism” being heard now more than in the 1960s has as much to do with the racism of blacks and people of color as it does with white racism---the charge of racism is now even hurled daily, hourly, against our President.

The honest way out of this mess of no-longer-working social niceties and the increasing charges of racism is to finally admit that human nature is genetically kin and ethnic or racial centered and has been since humans became human. Then we can begin to find long-term ways to solve our racial and class differences: such as forming an ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions in the United States from out of our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by federalism. 

That won't be easy but it's better than suicidal civil war.  

The Outward Path of the hero and heroine in evolution is the next biological and cultural religious impulse

In essence, the love of tradition is the love of human nature. The science of sociobiology is more realistic and objective than religion in defining human nature, although their definitions of human nature are quite similar in seeing human nature as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection---although most religions swerve away from the ethnocentric and even xenophobic reality of human nature, perhaps due to a need of universalism.

Nietzsche thought that Christianity (and traditional religions) were mostly concerned with the production of the saint by way of the ascetic Inward Path. I believe that the Outward Path of the hero and heroine in evolution is the next biological and cultural religious impulse. This time the path is devoted to evolving in the material world to supermaterial Godhood. But the Outward Path of the hero and heroine conservatively does not reject the Inward Path of the production of the saint, the Outward Path of is just the next stage or transformation of religion---both are included in the Twofold Path to Godhood.

The pursuit of “progress” does not lead to despair, as the traditionalists tend to think; progress bonded to biological evolution is bonded to that which creates cultures and religions, due to the basic biological origin of social behavior, which seeks the highest success in survival by way of ever ascending levels of Godhood.

If we survive the globalists who still have all the power

Globalists on the right and the left have been destroying the West, with the globalists right objecting to nationalism/globalism for profit reasons, and the globalists left objecting because they believe that differences are evil. And the Big Media and the schools are firmly on the side of the globalists.

But people have been objecting and populism has risen in Europe and America, as one might expect, because globalism goes against virtually all of real human nature, except maybe personal greed. Human nature remains kin-centered, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other conserving things, with group-selection, which normally means ethnic selection, as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

Populism/nationalism hates globalism so I like populism/nationalism, but I like the ethnostatists better because the ethnostatists, few as they are, champion national and ethnic differences in the way that makes a difference: by affirming ethnostates within existing countries for distinctly different ethnic groups to be what they really are genetically and culturally, protected from the globalists by forms of federalism.

If we survive the globalists who still have all the power, that is the way I see things going in the world of political configurations, because it's the way human nature can best thrive.

Testing Tucker Carlson's motto of being “the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and group think”

The motto for Tucker Carlson's generally excellent Television show on Fox is to be the “the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and group think.” Let me test that motto regarding Carlson's adamant insistence on leaving “race” out of the political debates. That's like leaving nature out of human nature.

Conservatism comes quite close to defining human nature the way the science of sociobiology defines human nature as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. Group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection in normal conditions really means the preference for ethnic selection relating to homogeneity and the affinity of genes and genetic survival.

In today's world affirming the preference for kin and ethnic selection is where intelligence or courage often fails, and lying, pomposity, smugness and group think take over the minds of both conservatives and liberals, helped along by brainwashing in our schools and in the Big Media, who promote cultural Marxism, which is itself more the will to power of those who are, ironically, often ethnocentric.

In Carlson's case I don't think the denial of ethnocentrism in real human nature is a lack of intelligence or courage, it is more the religious conviction that human nature has fallen from its original high perch of universal equality and love under God in the Garden of Eden. So human nature is stuck with such things as ethnocentrism and an evil human nature, which can only be redeemed by the dream of universal equality and love under God.

The insistence on leaving race or ethnicity out of the political debates blocks real solutions to the racial disruptions which are increasingly tearing apart America and the West. The common sense solution, relating to real human nature, of developing ethnostates or an ethnopluralism of ethnostates and regions in the United States---which could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states---is considered politically incorrect by the lying, pomposity, smugness and group think of both the left and the right.

The healthy political, psychological, and biological coordination of our three brains

Conservatives and traditionalist's tend to pay more attention to the whole brain and the whole person by affirming the territoriality and social hierarchies of the reptilian brain, the group and family concerns of the mammalian brain, as well as the reasoning of the Neo-cortex.

Modern liberalism tends to pay more attention to the Neo-cortex, the higher brain, with their Utopian egalitarianism, even if their tendency toward hedonism looks more primitive.

A more complete cultural and psychological health comes from coordinating with the biological origin of our social behavior and real human nature, which is kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

We can then complete our political, psychological, and biological coordination by forming or reforming ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates; an ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from imperial marauders and supremacists by federalism.

Harmonizing the whole brain provides a healthier more natural coordination of the nervous system, with less personal and cultural neurosis perhaps caused at least in part from uncoordinated signals coming in from the three brains.

The real antidote to the relativity or purposelessness of the will to power and the cultural Marxism we see today

We can see how Nietzsche could become cynical about human beings, so much of human behavior has to do with people being concerned with their own interests even to the point of disregarding standards and moralities in order to achieve them. Nietzsche ended up calling this the will to power, people only used morality as a means to power---Nietzsche viewed religion as doing this.

Nietzsche was almost right in his cynicism, but his postmodern intellectual followers thought he was all right, and they picked up the banner of the relativity or purposelessness of all power values, somehow overlooking the idea that this meant that their relativity of values was also relative. And many of the post-moderns also somehow arrived at Marxism or cultural Marxism as their political philosophy, overlooking the idea that Marxism was also their own relative will to power in action.

The problem is that the will to power is not relative, it has the deeper goal, the sacred goal, of attaining the zenith of success in survival and reproduction by way of material evolution all the way to ascending levels of Godhood. Religion, politics, and culture in general have unconsciously used the will to power and their cultural creations for that unconscious divine purpose. 

The philosophy of theological materialism seeks to make that deeper goal, that sacred goal, conscious, believing that this is the real antidote to the relativity or purposelessness of the will to power and the cultural Marxism we see today. Natural morality and religion can return without cynicism.

The biological origin of our social behavior actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern relativism and the cultural Marxist ideologues. But it also takes some of the virtue-signaling away from conservatives. Morality, religion, ethnostates, and ethnopluralism can return without cynicism, in harmony with kin and ethnic-centered human nature, along with the evolutionary activation of life toward Godhood.

Religion and evolutionary conservatism

Most philosophers if affirming theological materialism would probably reject the old Inward Path to the symbolic or spiritual God or Father-Within as an inaccurate and unrealistic block on the material evolution to real supermaterial Godhood in the evolutionary Outward Path. Indeed, to attain the peak experience of the God Within, which is a blissful experience, ascetics turn their backs on material life entirely and specifically block reproduction with celibacy, which blocks the natural method of evolutionary reproduction toward Godhood.

My respect for the conservative and traditionalist philosophy is indicated by the Twofold Path retaining the old Inward Path to the symbolic God or Father-Within even though it is transformed in the Evolutionary Outward Path of material evolution to supermaterial Godhood. The Twofold Path synthesizes traditional religious philosophy with the great Darwinian book of nature and evolution.

We need to conserve the best that evolves even as we continue to evolve toward ascending levels of Godhood and toward supreme intelligence, beauty, and goodness. Change using steady pressure and not revolution is the conservative way to evolve, in same way we evolved three brains, one evolved upon the other---the reptilian and the mammalian brains were retained even as we evolved the higher neocortex. That describes evolutionary conservatism in religion.

Do we have the will and brains to deepen the American definition of human nature, natural law, and natural rights?

Our nation is gradually falling apart from its experiment with unnatural multiculturalism, so the question is, do we have the will and brains to deepen the American definition of human nature, natural law, and natural rights, or will we limp along and slowly fall like the Roman Empire, or have radical revolution take us who knows where?

Conservative's rightly tell us that natural law was important to the Founders and that they based many of our laws on what they believed we are naturally as human beings in our human nature and in nature itself, and they called these natural rights; that is what they meant by all people having equal and inalienable rights, the right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. They did not see a natural or divine right of kings to rule over the freedom of commoners---they were trying to escape English kings.

The Founders probably would have agreed with much of the sociobiological definition of human nature, which came many years later and grew out of the work of Charles Darwin, saying that human nature is primarily and genetically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, and religious-making, among other conservative things, and they would call those natural rights. But the Founders probably would not have agreed with the rest of the sociobiological definition of human nature which says that human nature is also hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. And there is the rub.

But not to worry conservatives too much, the Constitutional separation of powers and states could allow for human nature and natural rights to also be defined as hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. It might take a few Constitutional amendments to get up to speed, but conservatism is also about change, that is, change within the system and not radical change. Ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in line with the whole of human nature, natural law, and natural rights, could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, and protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by federalism.

On the acceptance of whites becoming a minority by whites

Almost more astounding than the prediction that whites will be a minority in the United States, Canada, and New Zealand by 2050 is the lack of concern about it. Why?

It is mostly do to the Media and the schools constantly affirming this trend to make whites a minority, and by threatening anyone who objects to it with the charge of racism and all the social consequences of that label. 

But the seeming acceptance of whites becoming a minority by whites also has to do with the altruism of Northern ethnic groups, which was strongly genetically programmed into Northern Europeans and Northern Asians; altruistic behavior by an individual that looked like it may be disadvantages to the individual benefited others of its kind. This was especially important in the North for survival during and after the last Ice Age. But altruism stops being beneficial to ethnic groups in multicultural states and becomes more suicidal.

Also, none of us were taught in our schools or in the popular Media to know that as the people change the culture changes, so we have not fully realized that we will largely lose our culture too when whites become a minority.

Are these fatal flaws for whites? We will probably end up with the choice of saving ourselves and our cultures by separating into regionalism, localism, ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by some sort of federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states. It is probably that, or something like it, or the fading away of whites.

Entelechy will one day be acknowledged by both science and religion

I find the arguments that evolution is “non-purposive” and random as closed as the religious arguments denying evolution, information is lacking in both arguments.

“Entelechy” is the hypothetical agency in some vitalist doctrines, not yet demonstrable by normal scientific methods, which is considered an inherent regulating and directing force in the development and functioning of an organism. I see the concept as the inward activating material force of “Tirips,” which activates material life inwardly to evolve toward the zenith of success in survival and reproduction and toward supermaterial Godhood, while working within the outside ups and downs of natural evolution.

Tirips essentially defines "life" itself, the material activation within life, within every cell of the body, demanding things like metabolism and reproduction. Why? Tirips essentially activates material life to be "life," which ultimately means to evolve in the material world, if possible all the way to the zenith of success in survival and reproduction, which means to ascending levels of Godhood, while working within the ups and downs of outside natural evolution.

I see evolution moving inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward “higher and higher more effective living forms,”as Cattell put it. The goal of evolving to Godhood need not deprive us of either science or religion.

Defining Tirips as internally activating life toward evolving toward higher and higher forms and eventually to Godhood, shaped by natural outside evolution, may be a bit further than present science and religion want to go, but we can go there. I think such a drive and direction will one day be acknowledged by both science and religion.

Clean out the stables of our humanities departments

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers," said Shakespeare's "Dick The Butcher," supposedly making a joke. In today's world I would expand that to humanities professors.

The problem seems to stem from professorships being a paid occupation, from the pressure to continually publish academic work to further careers, and from there being too many hungry professors. Deeper than that, humanities professors, like normal people, are driven by natural wills to power and the drive for survival and reproductive success, whether they are conscious of it our not.

Such hooey as “post-structuralist” deconstruction, Lacanian analysis, ect. was brought to our colleges and universities by French intellectuals---who tend to like over-complication---and was greedily picked up by American professors desperate to publish academic work to further their careers or perish. The gibberish of postmodernism was also a way to attack the hated traditional West since most of these slight of hand academics were Marxist, or cultural Marxists.

In one or two simplified herculean sweeps the verdicts of the science of sociobiology could clean out the Augean stables of our postmodern humanities departments, which contain a great amount of horseshit.

Edward O. Wilson, the father of the science of sociobiology wrote: "The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool. The brain is a product of evolution. Human behavior. . .is the circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact. Morality has no other demonstrable ultimate function."

Wilson or his younger followers would be my choice to clean out our humanities departments and virtually begin again. It won't be easy because who wants to lose the two cars in every garage and the large Smart Led TV?

Scientific materialism need not be god-free or religion-free, materialism does not restrict the moral imagination

Traditional religionists and spiritualists tell us that materialism is reductionist and a restriction on the moral imagination, but that is because they have not imagined the material evolution to Godhood.

When the spiritual blockade is lifted we can see that the material world can evolve toward Godhood. Scientific materialism need not be god-free or religion-free.

Human nature is circumscribed by our biological equipment but the material evolution from frogs to man can continue from man to ascending levels of Godhood.

The old dualities between the material and the spiritual, mind and body, led to the unfortunate split between science and religion, which no-longer needs to apply.

Materialism does not restrict the moral imagination, spiritualist ghost stories have been replaced by science fiction.

The problem with occult metaphysics

What has been formerly thought of as spiritual is supermaterial. Enchain man to matter? The problem here, and with occult metaphysics in generally (and also seen in the revealed religions) derives from the perpetuation of the material world as dark, and the so-called non-material spiritual world as light. This duality does not really exist, material life evolves to supermaterial life and eventually if successful to supermaterial Godhood at the zenith of evolution.

Radical revolution, occult or otherwise, is not necessary, the new is conservatively enfolded in the old. It is through the material and supermaterial evolution of life that real Godhood is reached, which is far beyond the inward, human, experience of God, blissful as that is. Calling the material world or material evolution evil or dark actually blocks the Path to real Godhood---if anything that is evil. In distinguishing between ascending and descending evolution, the Paths find balance in the Twofold Path where the Involutionary Inward Path is seen as only the symbolic-experience of the supermaterial Godhood reached in the Evolutionary Outward Path of evolution, as described in theological materialism.

There is no need to waste time trying to untie the various still-existing Gordian Knots of the occult world. The "transmutation" of man to Godhood is accomplished through material evolution. This is the real "alchemy", and it is the central concern of the Evolutionary Outward Path. The Inward Path contains the ancient version of the alchemy which attempts to transmute man inwardly to at least mirror the Golden Soul-Within. Material/supermaterial evolution applies the real, not symbolic, “elixir of the philosopher's stone,” which includes man evolving beyond man to ascending levels of Golden Godhood.

Blavatsky claimed to unite the eastern and western occult traditions but she tried to unite only the Inward Paths, and that was not nearly enough. Dugin's present Russian Eurasianism could be at least tangentially connected to the traditionalist occult of Shambhala, and the West tangentially connected to the Atlantis-Kabbalah occult, but both compete for the same truncated Inward God. Even if the Kabbalah may have been originally derived from Indo-European or proto-Indo-European sources, the orthodox Jewish adepts of the Kabbalah are light years ahead of the other occult groups. Yet even the Kabbalah joins their two paths in the Sephirot to the Unnamed Inward God, which is also not enough.

This becomes as much an exoteric as an esoteric divine mission, joining science and religion. Separations, variety, ethnostates, and rational territoriality are necessary to evolution, given kin and ethnic-centered human nature, and all groups can share evolutionary knowledge in the long heroic path to Godhood.

The real ethnic problems come from supremacism, not from ethnocentrism

The dictionary definition of racism is “the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another.” In the increasing charges of “racism” now being hurled against people on the right, the first part of that definition is bypassed for the second part. But the charge of racism is also often underhandedly used as the racist will to power of one race over another---often the most ethnocentric or racist people make the most noise against racism.

Here is the predicament: real human nature is ethnocentric or racist because for many thousands of years right up to our present time group selection, or group altruism, was the best way to be successful in survival and reproduction. So human nature became genetically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

The real ethnic problems come from supremacism, from applying the second part of that definition of racism, from distinguishing races as inferior or superior to one another. That might have worked for survival success in very difficult times, in hunter gatherer times, but in our overpopulated world today claiming supremacism and imperialism is countered by all other groups ganging up on and destroying the upstart supremacist.

It is better to think of ethnic groups and races as different and distinct from one another, and as only inferior or superior to one another in different areas. The racial problems we are now having in multicultural societies comes from claims or acts of supremacism and imperialism, from claims of being the only nobles or the only chosen, and from our real genetic ethnocentric human nature.  Distinctly different ethnic groups aren't melting together they are competing. This was predicable.

So what it to be done? My readers know what I think: real human nature leads naturally to the cultural expression of regionalism, localism, ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by some sort of federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. Given who we are this also appears to be the best way we can optimize the gene expression we inherited from our human ancestors.

The identity crisis is over and it's politically incorrect

When America accepted multiculturalism related to ignorant and malevolent immigration policies it set up an identity crisis in America, which was also seen across the Western world, especially since the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 which abolished the National Origins Formula, and removed discrimination against non-Northwestern European ethnic groups.

Then began the identity movements, the “me” movements of the hedonistc 1960's, the women's movement, etc. and finally the ethnic identity movement of today which, although politically incorrect, has finally solved the identity crisis in the West brought on by the ignorant and malevolent immigration policies of multiculturalism.

In spite of the big media and the schools being strongly against it, somehow the ethnic identity movement arrived at the social behavior that harmonizes with real human nature, which both tradition (more or less) and the Neo-Darwinist science of sociobiology define as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.

And wouldn't you know it, the ethnic identity movement, which solved the identity crisis, is considered politically incorrect by both liberals and conservatives. Belief in the universalism of equality before God on the right and belief in the universalism of equality before man on the left seems to be the sticking point against the ethnic identity movement, encouraged by those with decidedly unequal wills to power in the Big Media and the schools.

The ethnic identity movement does not affirm the racial supremacism of the old racial nationalism but affirms an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which is the realistic way of thinking about universalism or equality. For example, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, and protected by federalism.

In any case the identity crisis is over, and it's politically incorrect.

The fatal flaw of conservatism (and of course modern liberalism)

Conservative's will rightly talk and write about how Europe and America have enjoyed a common religion, common law and politics, and a common body of literature (see Russell Kirk), and how this is what holds our civilization together, and how when these common bonds fall the civilization falls. But in this litany of the bonds of civilization modern conservatives leave out ethnic and racial bonds which are the deepest foundation and bonding element of civilizations and cultures. This fatal flaw of conservatism (and of course modern liberalism) and the rise of multiculturalism has led to civil and racial disruptions and virtual civil war. Human nature is genetically and culturally kin-centered and ethnic-centered, which has always been the most successful behavior in survival and reproduction and in the building of cultures. 

Why did this happen? World War Two and Hitler's racial supremacism happened, which since the end of war has increasingly led to the burying of all political talk of the biological origin of social behavior even to the point of making the subject of a positive view of ethnic bonding illegal in some countries. The Big Media and our schools have been mainly responsible for this blockade, tearing apart the reputation and livelihood of anyone who spoke or wrote about the biological origin of social behavior or the ethnic and racial bonds needed to hold our civilizations and cultures together.

The only thing to do is to revive the subject of the biological origin of social behavior along with the positive view of ethnic and racial bonding. Our schools and our Big Media will need to lose their ruinous influence. For example, real human nature suggests that ethnostates and ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the most equitable political configuration for humans beings and human groups to live within. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. That is what we need to work toward, legally and within the traditional system. It's a noble venture.

Deeper even than religious bonds is the biological origin of social behavior

Conservative's believe that the common bonds of religion hold different ethnic groups together in harmony, so when religion falls the multi-culture falls. That is not quite sophistry and is true but it is an unfinished evaluation. Deeper even than religious bonds is the biological origin of social behavior which includes religion, with kin and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful survival and reproduction.

For that natural reason religions and cultures end up separating along ethnic lines, because shared genetic traits create more homogeneous cultures. People create cultures more than cultures create people. Religions are driven by the same biological origin of social behavior, working along with the various environments and nurturings of life.

This is why the call to revive ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, needs to be included along with religion in reviving long lasting societies and cultures. This also, more controversially, means that religion needs to get in harmony with the biological origin of social behavior, with kin and ethnic selection understood as the primary unit of successful survival and reproduction.

Conservatism already accepts most of the definition of human nature as described by the science of sociobiology as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.

This religious transformation, like evolution itself, can retain and conserve the best of past religions---the Inward Path to the God within of traditional religions is transformed in the Outward Path of material evolution to real Godhood. This transformation becomes easier to absorb when ascending levels of Godhood are seen as arrived at by way of material, not spiritual, evolution, as described in theological materialism.

People of color better go slow in waking up the white giant to identity politics

Do people of color really want to create racial or identity politics? I suppose now seems like a good time to bring up their racial causes because whites have their hands tied behind their backs and can't talk about white racial concerns—it's even against the law in some countries! But whites are a powerful force, after all, they largely created the Western world, so people of color better go slow in waking up the white giant to identity politics.