Both diversity and equality have been misdefined

 Diversity is a good thing in natural evolution, it gives the population a buffer against change so a population is better able to adapt to new environments, a higher variability of alleles can better adapt and evolve in a new environment. But in the postmodern world diversity is just another word for equality. And diversity and equality don't work in multicultural multiracial societies where the gain of one ethnic group is offset by the loss of another ethnic group, with much cruel social discord in the process.

The aristocratic ideal had the realistic common sense idea that some things, places, people, and ideas are better at some things than others. That should be a big part of defining both diversity and equality.

Real human nature is biologically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., with a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

Although now just rising, identity politics will continue to ascend, identifying with ethnicity, nationality, race, culture and faith is the world's future. People will see that diversity and equality within the same state is unrealistic, but a diversity of ethnostates is a great strength.