If
form is determined by content, what is ugly content? The opposite of
the classical standards of beauty, simplicity, restraint, proportion,
harmony, intelligence, clarity, strength...
Upward material
evolution might be called the art and science of attaining
beautiful form and noble content. The goal is attaining the zenith of
form and content, which is Godhood.
When we define classical
standards we can't stop at human perfection, as classical standards
tend to do, the ideal is Godhood which means materially evolving
beyond human form and content.
In defining Godhood we channel
all the subject matter we have. The Romantics used to say all the
arts end in music, we could say all life, art, politics, all
evolution, tends toward their highest completion in Godhood.
Not
“evolutionism”, which might be called evolution for evolution's
sake. That is a limitation, like art for art's sake in aestheticism.
Evolution has the sacred goal of ascending levels of Godhood, for the
sake of Godhood, and for the sake of the material activation within
life, or Tirips, which seeks Godhood, while it is also shaped
by outside evolution.
Can we live with the discontent from
seeking higher evolution and not stopping at the status quo? The
conservative connection with evolution comes in ordered evolution toward Godhood, beyond the Father Within, which was
first seen in the Inward Path of the great religions---now
transformed in the outward path of material evolution to ascending levels of
Godhood.
Revolutions, like war, tend to sweep all gains away.
That might slow down evolution which over time needs the order of
tradition and peace to seek and keep the best of the new, using
all fields in eugenics and genetic engineering to define and attain
the best, but still grounded in classical standards.
No comments:
Post a Comment