Political philosophers talk of ideologies, like the Great Reset, religious philosophers talk of covenants, mysticism, etc, like the Traditionalist School, I believe the Third Covenant, the Cosmic Covenant, surpasses both of these.
As Michael Rectenwald said in his excellent essay on Klaus Schwab, chairman of the World Economic Forum, “What Is the Great Reset?” (Imprimus, Dec 2021) “Another way of describing the goal of the Great Reset is “capitalism with Chinese characteristics”—a two-tiered economy, with profitable monopolies and the state on top and socialism for the majority below...While approved corporations are not necessarily monopolies, the tendency of the Great Reset is toward monopolization—vesting as much control over production and distribution in as few favored corporations as possible, while eliminating industries and producers deemed non-essential or inimical. To bring this reset about, Schwab writes, “[e]very country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed.”
As have said
before, my view of the absolute importance of
human evolution kept me away from the brilliant seduction of the
Traditionalist School which is where the Alt-right turned. Many have
now gone over to the school of Guenon, Evola, and the Russian Dugin,
and embraced a non-populist, old spiritual religious, imperialist,
hierarchy of rule, and have downplayed or even rejected the idea of
science and evolutionary progress. Why didn't
the Alt-right feature
more Western geniuses, men like the brilliant British/American
psychologist Raymond Cattell, or the great Neo-Darwinist field of
sociobiology, rather than converting to the West-hating Russian
imperialist Aleksandr Dugin and his Traditionalist School teachers,
Guénon and Evola who
did not find science (a jewel of the West) nearly as important as
Eastern spiritualism (a
jewel of the East).
I
wrote of Three
Covenants
explaining how in the First
Covenant
of Primordial Tradition the Spirit and Soul of the Inward Path were
understood as existing in the blood, that is, as being passed on only
racially and tribally to a chosen eg. (Jewish) or noble (Aryan)
people, etc.. Then Jesus Christ (and Eastern masters) brought the
knowledge that the spirit and Soul-Within need not be understood and
affirmed only racially or tribally but could be understood and
followed by any race, any people, universally, provided they were
taught the proper way to see or experience the God Within;
Christianity said we were “Chosen” through faith in Christ not
chosen by blood. That was the Second
Covenant.
Theological
materialism
(and the projected Theoevolutionary Church) affirm the mission and
path of the Third
Covenant,
the Cosmic Covenant of the Evolutionary Outward Path, which
revitalizes Primordial Tradition, Christianity, Hinduism etc. by once
again affirming the First
Covenant
of genetic and biological qualities within our material evolution to
supermaterial Godhood as applied to the Outward Path of material
evolution to supermaterial Godhood, yet also, as in the Second
Covenant,
this is applied to all people, all nations, all races, all people,
preferably living in their own protected states or ethnostates with
access to knowledge of the material
evolution to Godhood. That is the synthesis of the Three
Covenants
in theological
materialism.
The Third
Covenant acknowledges
the biological origin of our social behavior which can end the
intellectual separation between political ideologies and religious
covenants, pointing
toward the religious/political/cultural solution of the
ethnopluralism hypothesis, often written about here. It is a
conservative transformation---not revolution---that can bring about
an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which is the sociopolitical or
political/cultural structure most in harmony with kin-centered and
ethnocentric real human nature which evolved many thousands of years
ago and remains with us today. Each ethnostate, each ethnic group,
each race, can have access to knowledge of our sacred material
evolution to supermaterial Godhood, and can pursue that sacred
evolution in their own way in their own protected states, in the
variety that is conducive to evolution, perhaps aided by nonpartisan
international sociobiological research centers, as Raymond Cattell
suggested.
The forced
imperialism,
supremacism, and multiculturalism of the world
will give way to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in line with real
kin and ethnic-centered human nature. I think the real debate in the
U.S. should be over how we can conservatively adapt the
Constitutional separation of powers and states to an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates. Cooperative competition between small
ethnostates and regions, protected internally and externally from
imperialism,
supremacism, and multiculturalism by some sort
of federalism, which can bring the variety and creativity that evolution
prefers, as we all materially evolve toward Godhood.
No comments:
Post a Comment