Economic reform needs to synchronize with or even follow real human nature

Economic reform needs to synchronize with or even follow real human nature. And real human nature is best defined by the science of sociobiology which affirms the biological origin of social behavior.

Edward O. Wilson wrote “The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool. The brain is a product of evolution. Human behavior . .is the circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact...”

Human nature has been and remains genetically ethnocentric, even xenophobic, as well as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection, followed by individual-selection.

Which economic philosophy best synchronizes with or even follows real human nature? It would center on an ethnopluralism of ethnostates which could be conservatively and legally established in America largely within the traditional American framework of our separation of powers and states. We would conservatively take something from economic nationalism especially, but also from laissez-faire capitalism and perhaps distributism. We need to honor real human nature and the biological origin of social behavior and advocate the creation of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with their independence protected by economic nationalism and a defensive federalism.