Thursday, December 31, 2020

Future statesmanship and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates

The true, noble statesman according to Cicero, follows Plato in seeing the governing of the commonwealth as guardianship: he is in some deep spiritual sense "oblivious to [his] own advantage," at least in any vulgar sense of the term. Above all, he hates civic discord and dissension and aims to be just to the legitimate claims of the rich and the poor, the few and the many. Sedition and discord, culminating in civil war, are the great evils to be avoided” (Daniel J. Mahoney, “Ballast on the Ship of State: Statesmanship as Human Excellence,” Modern Age, Fall 2020)

If the noble statesman of the future see guardianship of the commonwealth and avoiding sedition and discord culminating in civil war as the way to go, then they will propose and defend an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. They will honor the biological origin of social behavior by taking on the damaging racial competitions disguised as calls for equality etc., and advocate the creation of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, in harmony with real human nature, which is genetically ethnocentric, even xenophobic, as well as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection. Then they will protect each ethnostate from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, chosenists, Marxists, etc.

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states. Nothing less will define the goals of the true and noble statesman of the future.

No comments:

Post a Comment