One of the main differences between Archeofuturism (AF)---which is Guillaume Faye’s view of the ancients united not with the moderns but with the futurists---and the Theoevolutionary Church (TC), is the Conservatism of TC and the more or less radical traditionalism of AF. Both world views more of less affirm futurism but the Conservatism of TC takes a more realistic position, considering the present condition of the West and the prospects for radical change. Perhaps TC emphasizes evolution and science more as well.T C is a three-fold, Traditional-Conservative(modern?)-Futurist perspective.
Another difference seems to be our attitude toward power. AF appears to embrace the ring of power in a more or less Nietzschean affirmation, TC seeks to divide power for many reasons, including longer term peace. This affirms the Christian attitude toward power against statism, yet stands for light federalism and protectionism.
The question is, can Christendom revive the martial spirit necessary to save Christendom without being overcome with the thirst for power? TC can provide the added biological imperative with the evolutionary path to Godhood within our otherwise Christian involutionary religion. But this does require change.
Another difference seems to be our attitude toward power. AF appears to embrace the ring of power in a more or less Nietzschean affirmation, TC seeks to divide power for many reasons, including longer term peace. This affirms the Christian attitude toward power against statism, yet stands for light federalism and protectionism.
The question is, can Christendom revive the martial spirit necessary to save Christendom without being overcome with the thirst for power? TC can provide the added biological imperative with the evolutionary path to Godhood within our otherwise Christian involutionary religion. But this does require change.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment