Eugenics is the instinctive and logical social and religious outcome of discovering and defining real human nature

Everyone already practices eugenics when they choose a mate based on attributes that are related to their genetic heritage. Gene editing companies are now offering services in “agbiotech, biobanking, cell therapy, DNA sequencing, stems, synthetic biology, and vaccines.” GeoffreyMiller reports that China has been running the world's largest and most successful eugenics program for more than thirty years, which is driving China's ever-faster rise as the global superpower.

Human nature systematically evolved to prefer kin and ethnic group because those traits were more successful in survival and reproduction of the genes of individuals and groups. Even altruism, being for others, was created as the preference for kin and ethnic group; altruism obviously weakens as we move out toward universalism.

If real kin and ethnic-centered human nature was allowed to be what it is, it would naturally lead to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, eventually ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

The instinctive and logical social outcome of discovering and defining real human nature leads to a religion which affirms Godhood as the zenith of material evolution, and eugenics the way to get there. Godhood is not seen as apart from material life or otherworldly (spiritual) but as the goal of ascending levels of materially evolved life, rationally reached at the instigation of the will to life. Godhood as the zenith of life and material evolution is then defined as ultimate truth, beauty and goodness.

Evolutionary conservatism and theological materialism can overcome the loss of religious direction and the nihilism of modern thinking

Evolutionary conservatism is a biologically informed approach to the study of human behavior and politics, evolutionary conservatism adds to and deepens conservatism. Theological materialism affirms the material biological evolution of man all the way to Godhood; but in a conservative way.

Evolutionary conservatism adds to and deepens basic paleoconservatism by affirming the biological origin of social behavior. Human nature is biologically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection.

Even "order," which is so important to Burke and Kirk, is put in place because orderly societies are more successful in survival and reproduction than disorderly societies. But like the liberals and neoconservatives the paleoconservative's block or conceal the ethnic-centered and xenophobic parts of human nature due it seems to universalist religious edicts.

If real kin and ethnic-centered human nature was allowed to be what it is, it would naturally lead to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, eventually ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

Paleoconservative 's are very skeptical of human progress and “shun the worship of material progress, particularly when that progress is linked to government efforts to improve human nature.” (Clyde Wilson) Theological materialism sees material progress as life infused with the upward climb of evolution toward ascending levels of Godhood at the zenith of material evolution, which we can and should aid with the evolutionary sciences.

Natural law in evolutionary conservatism brings a conservatism grounded in the transcendent order of material evolution to Godhood, which counters both the stagnation of traditional conservatism and the nihilism of modern thinking. The coming species will evolve far beyond the human species, and far beyond increased human consciousness to God-Consciousness.

We need to love and protect our own groups, states and nations, as human nature and our human instincts intend us to do, but we also need to think and move beyond the human species toward evolving future and better species, all the way to Godhood. This is a worldview which can overcome the loss of religious direction and the nihilism of modern thinking.

The cultural Marxists and the Black Lives Matter movement are encouraging the thing they are most against: white racism

William Lind pointed out that the older version of Marxism concentrated on putting workers and peasants over capitalists, landlords, and the bourgeoisie, whereas Cultural Marxism and the the Black Lives Matter movement have been seeking to put women, blacks, and gays over men, whites, and straights by using psychological conditioning designed to generate self-hatred among males, whites, and straights.

It's diabolical because when males, whites, and straights stand up themselves they are really standing up for the very existence of their race and gender, which opens themselves up to the charge of being racists. So the cultural Marxists and the Black Lives Matter movement are really encouraging the thing they are most against: white racism.

All races are “systemically racist” when human behavior is seen from the realistic biological origin of social behavior. The Black Lives Matter movement which has been loudly accusing all whites of being racist is driven by the very same systemic black racism.

Real human nature is and has always been genetically kin and ethnic centered with ethnic selection as the main unit of successful survival and reproduction, followed by individual selection. We are naturally fragmenting into a nation of competing races in a zero game where the gains of one ethnic group is offset by the losses of another ethnic group, with much cruel social discord in the process. America has not successfully united different races and ethnic groups. But all is not lost.

As one historian put it, what formerly divided us can put us back together again. It would be far more realistic to talk of un-assimilating differences rather than about superiority/inferiority. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established, legally, in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

Matter is really not passive as Newton's first law claimed

If matter is condensed energy then energy is matter in another form, so matter is really not passive as Newton's first law said, matter in the form of energy moves matter.

I believe matter in the form of energy moves matter from within matter as well as from outside of matter. There is more than an outward action or reaction with matter, there is an inward vitalism working within and shaped by outside evolution, which is the activation of the will to life as inward metabolism, growth, reproduction.

Theological materialism then amplifies this vitalist will to life with the goal of the will-to-evolve-toward-Godhood. Spirituality is not needed in religion when matter is not passive. It is matter not spirit that is evolving to its zenith of Godhood.

If real kin and ethnic-centered human nature was allowed to be what it is

Racism has been exclusively defined in the U.S and the West as the evil hatred of all races other than your own race and the evil belief in the superiority of ones own race. But human nature systematically evolved to prefer kin and ethnic group because those traits were more successful in survival and reproduction for individuals and groups. Even altruism, being for others, was created as the preference for kin and ethnic group; altruism obviously weakens as we move out toward universalism, which is the main reason why communism, socialism, and globalism don't work well. Real human nature has always been genetically kin and ethnic centered, its the default position taken automatically without active consideration, group selection or ethnic selection has always been the main unit of successful survival and reproduction.

Negative racism could be called the hatred of races other than your own race, and positive would be the love of ones own race. But neither the left nor the conventional conservative right will consider racism as being anything other than evil, which is really saying that real human nature is evil; that attitude will never save anyone, and certainly won't stop racism. If real kin and ethnic-centered human nature was allowed to be what it is, it would naturally lead to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, eventually ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

Will Fourth Generation War Eventually Lead to Ethnostates?

I think William Lind is right in his assessment of our having a crisis of the legitimacy of the state. “Fourth Generation War Comes to a Theater Near You.

Lind writes: “This crisis varies greatly in intensity from one state to another, but almost everywhere we see people in growing numbers transfer their primary loyalty away from the state to non-state entities: race, religion, ideology, or political causes such as animal rights, etc. Many of those people, who would never fight for their state, are willing, even eager, to fight for their new primary loyalty. The consequence is that the state loses the monopoly on war it claimed at Westphalia. As van Creveld says, the key change in the Fourth Generation is not how war is fought (although that does change), but who fights and what they fight for.”

Lind goes on to say: “We threw away our domination in three great Western civil wars: World War I, World War II, and the Cold War. Now, the West is just one contending culture among many, the state to which the West gave birth is failing everywhere, and the questions of ultimate meaning that modernity discarded are returning to haunt its senescence.”

Lind asks: “So, is the future of the American state hopeless? Probably. I can see three possible outcomes to the crisis of legitimacy of the American state.

The first is that the dynasty falls and a competent new establishment class replaces it, one that can make the federal government work for everyone and that ceases to wage ideological war on its own people. In theory, this is possible, but I see no signs of it happening, nor any forces on the horizon that are capable of doing it. The system is so loaded against third parties that this route is effectively blocked. The Democrats are hopelessly in thrall to cultural Marxism because their base either believes in it, profits from it, or both. President Trump has shown himself incapable of remaking the Republican Party in his anti-Establishment, politically incorrect image. Could his successor do it, perhaps someone such as Tucker Carlson? Hope springs eternal, but hope is also a fool.

A second possibility is that both left and right could see the horrors that widespread Fourth Generation War on American soil would bring, step back, and work together to avoid it. There is a way to do that, by returning to American federalism as it was practiced before 1860.

When the Constitution was drafted and ratified, none of the men involved ever imagined that life in, say, Massachusetts and South Carolina would become the same. Still less did they conceive that the Constitution gave the federal government authority to make them the same. Were we to return to their understanding of federalism, we could maintain the union while accommodating cultural differences. Some states would be right, others left. If you found yourself being governed by people you despised, you would not need to fight. You could simply move. We would still be one country for foreign policy, defense, macroeconomics, and infrastructure. But leftists would be free to misrule the West Coast to their hearts’ content, while conservatives enjoyed the neighborliness and good food of the Old South.

The third and most likely possibility is that the country breaks apart in widespread Fourth Generation War. Welcome to Libya, Syria, and a growing portion of the world.

If the third possibility becomes reality and America as we know it disappears from the world’s landscape, its vanishing will be part of something larger: the end of the modern age that gave birth to the state.

Can the times be redeemed? Probably not, but as men of the West, we must try."

---

I believe that the science of sociobiology and natural common sense predict that if real kin and ethnic-centered human nature was allowed to be what it is, the biological origin of social behavior leads to ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red. Evolutionary conservatism suggests that real kin and ethnic-centered human nature naturally leads to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, eventually ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. But each ethnostate needs to be protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., with some kind of defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.